comparison

Fuji Neopan Acros 100 vs Kodak T-Max 100

Japan or America, at ISO 100.

Fuji Neopan Acros 100 applied to a reference photo — Fuji Neopan Acros 100

Kodak T-Max 100 applied to the same reference photo — Kodak T-Max 100

The same photograph, same exposure, both looks at full strength. See the untouched original.

The difference

Acros renders slightly cooler and crisper with exceptional highlight separation; T-Max is a touch warmer and more linear. The real difference on film was reciprocity — Acros could hold a two-minute exposure with almost no compensation, which no other film here can claim, and that made it the night and long-exposure film. As a look, Acros reads cleaner and more clinical.

Which to use

Acros 100

Cool, crisp, architectural. Night and long exposure work.

T-Max 100

Warmer neutral tone and a slightly gentler highlight roll-off.

Side by side

	Fuji Neopan Acros 100	Kodak T-Max 100
Type	black & white	black & white
Maker	Fujifilm	Kodak
Speed	ISO 100	ISO 100
Produced	2001–present	1986–present
Renderings here	1	1
Download	.cube	.cube

Try Fuji Neopan Acros 100 on your photo → Try Kodak T-Max 100

A comparison on somebody else's reference photograph only tells you so much. Both of these render on your image in the tool, alongside the other 294.