comparison
Fuji X-Trans III Acros vs Fuji Neopan Acros 100
The simulation against the emulsion it is named for.
The same photograph, same exposure, both looks at full strength. See the untouched original.
The difference
The Acros simulation reproduces the film's tonal character — rich blacks, smooth midtone gradation, crisp highlights — without the film's defining practical advantage, which was reciprocity behaviour that no digital sensor needs. What the simulation adds is optional colour filters: green, red and yellow renderings that reproduce what glass filters did on the original film.
Which to use
X-Trans Acros
When you want the filter variants, or a slightly more contained rendering.
Neopan Acros 100
The film's own tonality, cooler and a touch crisper.
Side by side
| Fuji X-Trans III Acros | Fuji Neopan Acros 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | digital | black & white |
| Maker | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Speed | ISO — | ISO 100 |
| Produced | 2016–present | 2001–present |
| Renderings here | 4 | 1 |
| Download | .cube | .cube |
Try Fuji X-Trans III Acros on your photo → Try Fuji Neopan Acros 100
A comparison on somebody else's reference photograph only tells you so much. Both of these render on your image in the tool, alongside the other 294.