comparison
Ilford Delta 3200 vs Kodak T-Max 3200
Which fast black and white?
The same photograph, same exposure, both looks at full strength. See the untouched original.
The difference
Neither is really ISO 3200 — both are roughly ISO 1000 films designed to be pushed, which is why their push variants matter more than their base renderings. Delta 3200 has larger, softer grain and lower contrast, so highlights bloom and shadows go grey. T-Max 3200 is a little tighter and holds more midtone separation. Delta is the more atmospheric, T-Max the more legible.
Which to use
Delta 3200
When the grain and the glow are the point.
T-Max 3200
When you still need to read the scene.
Side by side
| Ilford Delta 3200 | Kodak T-Max 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | black & white | black & white |
| Maker | Ilford | Kodak |
| Speed | ISO 3200 | ISO 3200 |
| Produced | 1998–present | 1988–present |
| Renderings here | 5 | 6 |
| Download | .cube | .cube |
Try Ilford Delta 3200 on your photo → Try Kodak T-Max 3200
A comparison on somebody else's reference photograph only tells you so much. Both of these render on your image in the tool, alongside the other 294.